Vedic Health: Ayurveda and Evidence-Based Research

May 23, 2019
Medicinal Terminalia arjuna over white background

healthysoch

New Delhi, May 23, 2019 :

There are six types of evidences accepted in the literature.

  1. Pratyaksha: What is seen or observed directly. These are observational studies and accepted in the scientific community.
  2. Anumana or the evidence based on the inference of a defined hypothesis
  3. Upamana are the evidences based on analogies
  4. Arthapathi are the evidences, which are based on circumstantial evidence
  5. Anupalabdhi is an evidence based on the theory of negation
  6. Shabda is undisputed evidence as it is written in text books and taught to us

Let us take an example to further understand this.

Here is a statement “Neem or Azadirachta indica is a good antiseptic.”

  1. Pratakysha: I would look for any observational study.
  2. Anumana: I will look for any double-blind study in the literature
  3. Upamana: As per Ayurveda, any plant which is bitter in nature will have anti-pitta qualities
  4. Arthapati: Circumstantial evidence and
  5. Anupalabdhi is evidence by negation.
  6. Shabda: Would refer to Sushrut Samhita reference as gold standard.

An Ayurveda doctor will follow the Shabda evidence, but a modern medicine doctor would prefer Anumana as evidence. But both are accepted evidences.

Comments

  • Original (primary) researchis based on data collected from individuals or clusters of individuals, with clusters defined by physician, clinic, geographic region, or other factors.
  • Within primary research, the hierarchy of evidence must be considered to minimize the risk of bias.
  • For studies evaluating therapy or harm, well-conducted randomized clinical trials are superior to observational studies, which are superior to unsystematic clinical observations
  • Questions regarding benefits (and harms) of an intervention are best answered with randomized controlled trials; whereas questions regarding risk factors for disease and prognosis are best answered with prospective cohort studies.
  • Systematic reviews and meta-analysesare best for answering single questions (e.g. the effectiveness of tight glucose control on microvascular complications of diabetes). They are more scientifically structured than traditional reviews, more open about how the authors attempted to find all relevant articles, judge the scientific quality of each study and weigh evidence from multiple studies with conflicting results. Systematic reviews pay particular attention to including all strong research, whether or not it has been published, to avoid publication bias (positive studies are preferentially published).
  • Summaries and guidelinesrepresent the highest level of complexity. Ideally, guidelines are a synthesis of systematic reviews, original research, clinical expertise, and patient preferences. At their best, summaries and guidelines are a comprehensive synthesis of the best available evidence, from which the guidelines themselves follow. Guidelines should therefore be based on a critical appraisal of the relevant original research and systematic reviews. There are several examples of multiple guidelines on the same topic making contradictory recommendations

The accepted standards for guideline development include:

  • Rely on systematic reviews
  • Grade the quality of available evidence
  • Grade the strength of recommendations
  • Make an explicit connection between evidence and recommendations

Strength of the recommendation: A recommendation is a strong recommendation to do (or not do) something, where the benefits clearly outweigh the risks (or vice versa) for nearly all patients.

Grade 1 reflects a strong recommendation. A weak recommendation is made either when risks and benefits are more closely balanced or are more uncertain. Grade 2 reflects a weak recommendation.

Quality of evidence

Assessment of evidence quality in GRADE reflects confidence in the estimates of benefits, harms, and burdens.

GRADE can be implemented with either four levels of evidence quality or with three levels such that the “low” and “very low” categories are combined. The three levels use a letter (A, B, or C) for high-, moderate-, or low-/very low-quality evidence.

  • High-quality evidence typically comes from well-performed randomized controlled trials or other overwhelming evidence (such as well-executed observational studies with very large effects).
  • Moderate-quality evidence typically comes from randomized trials with important limitations or from other study designs with special strength.
  • Low-quality evidence typically comes from observational studies or from controlled trials with very serious limitations. Very low-quality evidence typically comes from non-systematic observations, biologic reasoning, or observational studies with serious limitations.

Based on the above we must come out with strength of evidence and quality of evidence for every Ayurveda treatment.

Let us review Azadirachta indica in Pubmed

  • There are 2467 studies on the subject.
  • There are over 138 mentions in headings.
  • There are 92 RCTs.
  • There are 308 systemic reviews
  • There are 30 observational studies

The conclusion that can be drawn is that from modern medicine point of view, Azadirachta indica will have Grade 1A scientific evidence that it has medicinal properties.

Author : Dr KK Aggarwal , Padma Shri Awardee

healthysoch

Stay informed with the latest news from HealthySoch. Sign up today for exclusive insights and updates!

We promise we never spam!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Health Tips

Dr. T S Kler Padma Bhushan Awardee
MD, DM, MRCP, FRCP(U.K), FACC, D.Sc
Chairman – Fortis Heart Institute Gurugram

Precautions to avoid Corona Virus:

  1. Stay home as far as possible.
  2. Wash hands with soap and water frequently.
  3. Keep distance from people even your home members.
  4. Keep atleast 1-2 metres away from anybody coughing.
  5. Don’t touch your face, nose and mouth.

 

Dr. K.K Says

Archives

MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
18192021222324
25262728293031
       
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
26272829   
       
891011121314
293031    
       
    123
45678910
11121314151617
25262728293031
       
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
27282930   
       
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
3031     
     12
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
2627282930  
       
1234567
891011121314
22232425262728
293031    
       
     12
3456789
17181920212223
24252627282930
       
  12345
6789101112
       
  12345
13141516171819
2728     
       
      1
9101112131415
3031     
   1234
567891011
       
282930    
       
    123
45678910
       
  12345
27282930   
       
      1
3031     
    123
11121314151617
       
28      
       
2930     
       
    123
       
       
       
      1
9101112131415
3031     
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272829 
       
  12345
13141516171819
2728293031  
       
      1
23242526272829
3031     
    123
       
    123
25262728   
       
78910111213
28293031   
       
293031    
       
14151617181920
28293031   
       
   1234
567891011
       
   1234
567891011
262728    
       
891011121314
293031    
       
    123
18192021222324
25262728293031
       
  12345
27282930   
       
      1
2345678
16171819202122
3031     
    123
45678910
18192021222324
       
28293031   
       
     12
31      
   1234
       
  12345
6789101112
       
HealthySoch

Don't Miss

Godrej Protekt Mr. Magic initiates swine flu awareness program

“Sensitizes school students on sanitation across 47 schools in Delhi”

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal writes to leading industrialists of India, seeking their help in combating the second COVID wave

Delhi does not produce any oxygen, and as you’re aware,